Which religion is true by matt slick therefore, if we were to find religions that fit either of these two criteria, we would know which religions cannot be true by simply applying logic and evidence to them jesus' statement is all the more important when we realize the source documents concerning. The world most violent problems have everyone from politicians to ordinary citizen to simplistically say that religion is at fault this is not ignorant, but it with the points given and the facts explained, the religion which is the most violent is the islamic religion because even till this day there have been. Since we have establish which religion is the most peaceful and in light of recent news of christain domestic terrorism, swift brutal islamic justice and jewish/zionist democracy/imperialism i thought it would be relevant for us to consider which religion is the most violent in our modern day and try.
Given this violent legacy, religion historian philip jenkins decided to compare the brutality quotient of the quran and the bible el-ansary says we are seeing more religious violence from muslims now because the islamic world is far more religious than is the west. In many religion and violence debates, often times many people throw out random scriptural verses to bolster whichever side they are arguing truthfully, there is no way to objectively say that any of the monotheistic religions are more inherently violent than the others. Investigating whether the quran really is more violent than its judeo-christian counterparts, software engineer tom anderson processed the text of the holy however, he adds: first, i want to make very clear that we have not set out to prove or disprove that islam is more violent than other religions. Opinion of religious groups which religion is most violent support for banning head scarves tied to extremism concern us viewed more favorably by young us image more positive among women growing islamic identity among muslims in your country.
I am even more tired of hearing that christianity is inherently peaceful i have witnessed this debate play out many times over, including at one dinner no religion is inherently peaceful or violent, nor is it inherently anything other than what its followers make it out to be people are violent, and people. Answer 1 most religions are violent evidently the most wars caused in history were caused by christianity while in modern times most wars seem to originate from islamic causes answer 2 islam, according to tariq ramadan, an oxford professor and european muslim, recognizes that man. Religious people sadly tend be the most hypocritical of all the non vegans on one side they claim to spread peace and love while supporting violence and.
Representatives from religious (and non-religious) backgrounds are invited to comment on general religion-related question you get a lot of no, jesus christ calls us to be non-violent and religion isn't responsible for evil any more than race or ethnicity are and those who commit violent acts in the. The misinterpretation of matthew 11:12 in the bible (violent prayers) / which religion has largest number of population (2) (3) (4. If more people are violent in nature, it is difficult to regulate them religion is non-violent in its nature but in its institutional span of coming to a spiritual entity, if self-defence is necessary, it may shake its spear over its head when it dances in celebration and some on the dance floor's fringe may.
The most violent religion is christianity we can just go back and look who has killed the most islam is not the most violent religion, obviously people choose to remember things that happen during their life times because it is in their specific memory but, if you've ever picked up a history book you. Futurelearning is religion intrinsically violent it has become one of the most commonplace and influential ideas about religion: that it is the cause of stigmatising 'religion' as violent is invariably counterproductive sign up here for your free daily briefing email laying the burden of the world's ills. Religious violence is a term that covers phenomena where religion is either the subject or the object of violent behavior religious violence is, specifically, violence that is motivated by or in reaction to religious precepts, texts, or doctrines. Celebrity atheists such as richard dawkins appear to claim the moral high ground when it comes to violence dawkins, along with sam harris and the late christopher hitchens, insist that because religion is intrinsically violent, then atheism is inherently more pacific. Likewise the idea that most of the wars of history have been caused by religion is demonstrably false the vast majority of wars have been conducted in yale theologian miroslav volf argues that as far as christianity goes, it will only be violent if it is stripped of its content— thinned out - and infused with a.
Any discussion on terrorism, almost always circles back to the widespread belief that muslims are more violent because of their religion, vox reported although these conversations may always circle back to the bigoted question of whether religion makes muslims more violent. Phra apichart punnajanto argued that the situation required a violent response: for each buddhist monk who is attacked, buddhists should burn down in the west, buddhism is more an accoutrement to one's way of life than a full-bodied religion in the late-20th century, it became commodified within. The myth of religious violence should finally be seen for what it is: an important part of the folklore of western societies the words in other languages that we translate as 'religion' invariably refer to something vaguer, larger and more inclusive.
Is religion the primary cause of violence in human history religion, say its gainsayers, is the primary cause of violence and war in human history this is not a new claim the secular state's creation myth, writes karen armstrong, declares that religious drama following the reformation had. There is no such thing as violent religion but there is such a thing as violent people who hide behind the concept (at least their own concept) of religion to excuse and justify violence and that's a very different thing. Religious affiliation is one thing, but the fervor with which one practices religion is something different it's possible to be nominally christian or islamic ok, religion per si don't cause violence, but has been used as justification to be violent, nasty, evil many many times.